Fantastic Baby 狐仙揉搓SOFT: muted protrusions and surface problems

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Dimensions and material change

The review gives 413g, an overall length of 13cm and an 11.5cm channel, in a very pale yellow close to white. It describes the exterior and channel molds as the same as the HARD version, with material as the main difference, without factory documentation.

On opening, the relative feel was close to -3. After two uses it became approximately -2 and then remained there. The reviewer classified it as -2 and interpreted the rapid change as aging, without chemical testing of the cause. These are not standardized hardness values. The sample had a sharp opening odor and a very tacky, oily surface that attracted dust. The source's odor rhetoric does not establish toxicity.

Molding and deformation

The protrusion layout matches HARD, with almost no internal damage, and the reviewer considered the surrounding thickness adequate. However, the sample's end had an approximately 45-degree slant, and the terminal channel was deformed too. Pressure during cooling was a hypothesis, not a verified cause. It did not noticeably affect that session's use, but remains a workmanship defect.

Comparison with HARD and 宫濑

Greater deformation produces looser surrounding contact than HARD and largely suppresses its clearly defined protrusion feel. Structures became briefly noticeable only at certain contact points or during external squeezing. The reviewer compared that pattern with 魔眼宫濑, while finding the sample's surface tack, oil and odor less satisfactory.

The source calls HARD's material–structure match a 100-point benchmark and gives SOFT at most 60 points in that comparison. This is a subjective comparison of the pairing, not a separate overall percentage rating. Its statement of a two-grade softness difference does not establish HARD's exact hardness.

Original verdict

Recommendation: 3 stars, without other numerical category scores. The protrusions are well formed, but softness weakens their definition, while the tacky, oily surface and sharp odor reduce appeal. The feel change after two uses and the deformed end remain important limitations. No long-term lifespan guarantee is supplied.