Ligre 侧上龟头2: Dense block-texture review
Ligre 侧上龟头2: Dense block-texture review
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.
Dimensions and exterior
The sample weighed 386g, with an overall length of 15.5cm and a 12.5cm channel. Its cylindrical body tapers from a broader front to a narrower rear. Undulations on the exterior provided effective grip, while the entry used a simple small circular opening.
The reviewer estimated relative firmness at about +0.5, then grouped it under +1 in a broader classification because stretch was limited. These represent a finer subjective estimate and a category, not conflicting standardized measurements. The surface felt somewhat oily and tacky, with little odor; stretch and elastic rebound were limited.
Structural changes
Like the first version, it uses repeating blocks, but these are smaller and more densely arranged. The reviewer estimated at least 3 times the density, a visual and experiential estimate rather than a precise measurement. Large interior gaps were reduced, allowing close contact with little deliberate air removal.
A straight channel and thick walls provided pronounced support, while low-stretch material reinforced contact pressure. The source considered end support ample, but supplied no puncture-resistance testing. This should not be read as a guarantee against damage.
Feedback and limitations
Pressure and structural feedback were strong. Despite repeating relief, the reviewer noticed local variations and changes in rhythm rather than clear monotony. Comfort also exceeded expectations. Limited rebound here maintained close, persistent pressure rather than creating a soft, yielding response.
The corresponding limitations are restricted internal space, limited stretch and high contact intensity. This is a strong-feedback design; the reviewer's positive comfort impression does not establish universal suitability.
Rating
The source awarded 5 stars overall, with no independent category scores. A compact channel, densely arranged blocks, effective exterior grip and distinct pressure changes were its main strengths. Surface oiliness, tackiness and low stretch are material characteristics to consider.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy