MODE 幻乳龙娘（序章篇） review

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

The final recommendation is 1 star. The reviewer estimates basic channel contact at about 3 stars, but delamination, cracks and extremely thin separation walls reduce the overall judgment. This is not a 3-star recommendation.

The sample weighs 5 kg, measures 12.5 cm overall and 10.5 cm internally, with a broad small torso. The material feels clay-like and substantial, with low oil and odor but pronounced tackiness and cracking concerns. Density and silicone analogies are not verified by testing. Coarse exterior detail resembles a smaller first-generation shape.

Soft chest filling lacks a distinct hard base but sits under thick skin. Both sides connect centrally, producing a joined shape. Firmness proportions vary by location, making compression uneven. Cutting confirms connected filling and obvious layering from neck to chest. The chest is already cracked; specific preventive care is not established, and eventual cracking cannot be generalized to all samples.

The front uses larger textures and the rear a tighter, simple structure. Channels sit very close, with translucent separation walls revealing underlying color in places and an actual hole at the end. Interior layers separated when cut, without manual peeling according to the reviewer. These were dismantling observations, not proof that every defect was visible on arrival.

Separation causes looseness between skin and filling, alongside extremely thin and damaged channel areas. Compared with COC 赤鸢, the reviewer finds more severe layering here, not equally severe damage in the comparison sample.

A large chest on a small torso does not itself prove improvement. GOSE 小鬼魔皇 serves as a comparison for soft-fill execution. Joined filling, uneven feel, chest cracking, thin separation and widespread layering matter more than intensity alone.

No standardized lifespan or confirmed repair method is supplied. Final recommendation: 1 star; the approximate 3-star channel-only impression does not cancel structural risks.