MUNI 埃及艳后: fixed spread shape with a damaged terminal wall

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Dimensions and exterior

The review records 2.6kg, a 14cm front channel and a 13cm rear channel. Fully spread legs create a nearly flat front and do not adjust to another layout. The text describes medium firmness, reasonable elasticity, low oil and odor, and slight tack after several uses, without a separate numerical hardness value. The painted entrance has layered detail; rear contours are less spherical than 皮小鬼2.

The black beaded fabric accessory showed little color transfer in a short test, but fit poorly. It lacks adjustment and its coverage length does not match. This does not establish custom manufacture, source or long-term resistance to staining.

Actual terminal defect

Disassembly exposed holes and torn, very thin material at the front terminal cavity; other areas were largely intact. Corresponding damaged material was visible from the rear channel. The section shows the channels approaching each other, while the front cavity abruptly widens and thins the separating wall. The reviewer attributed this to layout rather than random misalignment, without multiple-sample verification.

Existing holes are actual damage, not merely a future risk. Further tearing could enlarge the connection, change pressure and create air noise, but complete later merging was not documented and lifespan was not measured. The source's suggestion that a small hole might have limited effect is not advice to keep using a damaged sample.

Performance and comparison

The fixed spread layout offers direct alignment, little initial obstruction and reasonable grip, but few orientation options. Compared with the ordinary COC可可狼姬, the reviewer found more front-channel variation and somewhat greater intensity; both rear channels were unremarkable. Stronger front feedback does not offset structural damage.

Original verdict

Recommendation: 4 stars, without numerical category scores. Front variation and straightforward entry are strengths. Actual terminal holes, a thin separating wall, fixed shape and ill-fitting accessories are limitations. The overall rating does not establish a defect-free sample or proven lifespan.