Lovefactor 禁忌修女2代: Straight channel and end-cavity review

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Dimensions and exterior

The sample weighed 887g, measured 18cm overall and had a stated 13.5cm channel. In the cutaway, the red inner section was approximately 12.5cm. That section should be distinguished from the full channel including the entry. The body is substantial, with a lower-set center of gravity, more torso detail than the first version and no surface coloring.

Material felt similar to the first version: elastic, mildly milky-scented and fairly dry outside. No numerical firmness or identical formulation was confirmed. A slightly recessed entry was thought to reduce spills while marginally shortening usable reach; the amount was not measured.

Structural changes

The straighter channel uses fine mesh-like relief and three block sections instead of the first version's larger protrusions and suspended end structure. A thicker double entry leads to an enlarged end cavity. The transition into that space was easier to distinguish, and air removal improved close contact.

The end opening remained small, without the broad passage described for 圣洁之宫. Walls were thick, with no obvious weak areas, but no long-term durability verification was provided.

Comparison with the first version

The reviewer placed intensity after air removal at about 6/10, versus more than 7/10 for the first version. These are personal intensity impressions, not universal suitability scores. Finer texture, smoother entry and improved grip were positives; substantial front contact was retained and strengthened.

Distinctiveness and structural contrast were reduced, favoring a milder, comfortable response. A larger end cavity and closer contact after air removal partly compensated for lower intensity. The reviewer personally preferred the first version while considering this update more refined overall.

Rating

The source awarded 5 stars and described the overall impression as approximately 85 points, without a detailed scoring table. That overall impression is separate from the 6/10 intensity rating. Fine relief, grip, a straight path and air-removal contact were strengths. Lower structural intensity, a small end opening and less distinctive feedback were limitations.