GOSE 26289 Second-Generation Hip Model Review

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Specifications and material

The sample weighs 3.5kg. Its curved front channel is 13cm long; the rear channel measures 14.5cm. This is a 500g increase over the first generation's stated 3kg. The material remains at relative firmness 0, with good elasticity and a milky fragrance. The source notes a tendency for frequently rubbed areas of this material to peel with extended use, without providing standardized lifespan testing.

The second generation reduces the waist volume and concentrates more material in a rounder, more prominent rear. The visual and tactile difference therefore exceeds what a simple 500g increase might suggest. Entrance detailing and muscle contours are also more refined. The pink entrance uses an integrated inner-and-outer design similar to 忍道修炼. The reviewer considers it less prone to cracking than softer material, not immune to damage.

The two channels

The front channel adds larger features instead of relying mainly on the first generation's tightness. Its front portion is relatively open, while the rear narrows markedly. An abrupt constriction between them creates an approximately two-stage layout. This narrowing is not a separate terminal chamber: the source explicitly says that the second generation has no such chamber in the front channel.

The rear channel uses deformable mechanical-style texture. The brand describes pressure-dependent friction, and the reviewer expects larger contact dimensions to make it more noticeable. These are a brand description and subjective interpretation, not quantified test results. A similar channel was seen in another 火炮 hip model, but no design origin was established.

Neither channel in this sample had its internal channel rod protruding through the material. Reports of rear-channel displacement or protrusion from other users are separately mentioned; they are not observed defects in this sample.

Experience and comparison

After several uses, the rounder rear showed more pronounced rebound than the first generation, with easier entry. The range of usable positions remains similar. The more prominent front entrance improves accessible insertion depth. Larger features and a constriction in the front, together with stronger friction in the rear, make both channels more distinctive.

The reshaping follows a direction similar to 麻美2, but narrows the waist and projects the rear more aggressively. The rearward weight distribution and rounded shape improve impact feedback. The source nevertheless cautions about possible quality-control flaws around the entrances and rear-channel positioning, so individual sample condition matters.

Rating

The final recommendation is 5 stars, with no separate category scores. The reviewer retrospectively rates the first generation at approximately 3 stars. That is a comparison, not a subscore for this model; the earlier assessment had also benefited from the limited availability of compact hip models at the time.