AGIaegir 星座传说-双鱼座: Narrow blades and rear-channel limitations
AGIaegir 星座传说-双鱼座: Narrow blades and rear-channel limitations
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.
Dimensions and material
The sample weighed 806g, measured 16cm overall and had a stated 12.5cm channel; separate lengths for both channels were not supplied. Relative firmness was 0, with limited oil release, no obvious unusual odor and a smooth surface. Similarity in feel to GXP material does not confirm identical formulation.
Side recesses made the shape more three-dimensional and easy to grip, without additional feedback noted. An angled entry worked better in the forward orientation than reversed.
The two channels
The front uses repeating blades, each narrower than earlier same-brand designs. Reduced large gaps improved enclosure and comfort. The reviewer considered intensity moderate and relatively gentle. Rear-channel problems did not noticeably affect the front position.
The rear was shallow, close to the waist and lower wall. Handling produced pronounced wall pressure with poor support and simple relief. The reviewer considered it barely functional. No puncture was reported, but two channels do not establish two effective experiences. Forcefully spreading thin walls is not a solution.
Comparisons and limitations
Compared with 魔蝎座, narrower blades improved comfort without changing the repeating-blade style. Similar layouts in 麻美2 and 美臀殿堂 were disliked by the reviewer; soft material in mochi雪 made that design more acceptable. These are subjective sample comparisons.
Over longer handling, blades remained repetitive and supplied less uniform wall pressure than the reviewer's conventional reference channels. Improvement is not overall excellence, nor evidence of medical sensitivity or body fit.
Rating
The source awarded 3 stars overall, without category scores. Clean-feeling material, easy grip and improved narrow-blade comfort were positives. Repetition and rear-channel thinness, alignment and support were limitations.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy