TAMATOYS 性母教师: a substantial entrance and thinner rear
TAMATOYS 性母教师: a substantial entrance and thinner rear
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.
The title recommends it at 4 stars, and the experience graphic gives 4/5. The reviewer finds good enclosure at the front but less material and weaker contact at the rear.
Specifications and contents
Weight is approximately 530 g. Body length is about 15 cm, width about 6 cm and channel length about 13 cm. The sample contained only the body, without lubricant; contents may vary. Packaging is a flip-top cardboard box.
The pink body has a small round opening without a detailed realistic exterior. The entrance section is heavier, the rear thinner. Freshly unpacked it was not noticeably oily and had little odour. The material felt substantial with some softness, compared by the reviewer with CORON3代. Its final softness score is nevertheless 3/5, not exceptionally soft.
Channel and experience
The channel is broadly straight, tighter at the front and looser at the rear. A thick entrance and large initial features provide enclosure and compression, followed by a distinct resistance change. With less material farther inside, contact becomes less enveloping. Wall texture and elongated or rounded end features supply most of the rear variation.
The reviewer rates the experience above CORON3代 but below 003二代, finding more channel variety than CORON3. This is a personal assessment, not a controlled ranking. Complex-looking texture is moderated by softer material, leaving medium overall stimulation.
Air removal is mentioned without quantified suction changes; it does not establish strong suction or a guaranteed effect.
Cleaning and limitations
The source explicitly prohibits inside-out cleaning. The substantial entrance makes the rear harder to reach, with cleaning rated only 3/5. Low seepage and mild odour reduce surface oiliness but do not remove internal washing difficulty. The favourable durability score lacks long-term lifespan data.
Source ratings, out of 5; body scores read from graphics
- Title recommendation: 4 stars.
- Experience: 4/5.
- Durability: 4/5; no inside-out cleaning.
- Ease of cleaning: 3/5.
- Stimulation: 3/5.
- Tightness: 3/5, tighter front and looser rear.
- Softness: 3/5, substantial overall.
The thick entrance and varied front contact are balanced against weaker rear enclosure and cleaning limitations.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy