EXE 天使r穴 / 天使双穴: a 2200 g dual-channel body with cleaning access

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

The original headline recommendation and experience score were 5 stars. The source identified it as リアル—天使の極み—. The reviewer had previously used PUNI VIRGIN 1000 at 1000 g; this product weighed 2200 g, or 2.2 kg, substantially increasing handling and cleaning effort. This is an individual account.

The sample included the body and a fabric accessory but no lubricant; accessories may vary by batch. The fabric transferred dye, an explicit drawback that argues against continued contact with the body. An inner plastic tray supported the large product. Product and box needed considerable storage space. The body had a narrow waist and rounded lower mass and was difficult to move one-handed.

Both use entrances led to spiral channels. A further hole near the waist provided through-access for cleaning, not a third independent use channel. The author found it helpful for reaching and flushing the interior of the heavy body.

The main channel felt mild, with continuous enclosure rather than sharp spiral texture. Changing positioning and contact direction changed entrance resistance. The small secondary entrance was difficult to align with, and its channel was tighter and more intense. The same broad spiral design therefore offered distinct experiences, without additional large bumps or an end constriction.

The reviewer tried several orientations and personally preferred side contact. A support surface suited the 2.2 kg body better than handheld use. Stability, load capacity and channel length were not measured.

Through-access helped cleaning but allowed lubricant and other liquids to escape, making bedding harder to keep clean. The source proposed plugging the hole without testing plug compatibility or safety; this is not a universal recommendation. Even with cleaning access, the body's weight remained a handling burden.

Ratings: experience 5 stars; durability 4 without long-term testing; cleaning 3; intensity 3, milder in the main and stronger in the secondary; overall tightness 3 with different channels; softness 4. Strengths were substantial softness, spiral enclosure and channel contrast. Limitations were bulk, weight, the small secondary entrance, leakage and fabric dye transfer.